Impulse Space Patent Portfolio Analysis

Startup IP Intelligence Scintillation Research  ·  2026-09-22

One filing, two names, and thirty-nine months of silence

Impulse Space holds 1 patent family: 0 granted and 1 published and pending. Filing began in 2023, with the most recent published filing dated 2023-06-15.Patent figures from Google Patents Public Data, reviewed 2026-09-22. Funding: $308M Series D, Valor Equity Partners, Alumni Ventures and Founders Fund, 2026-09-16.

Impulse Space closed a $308M Series D in September 2026. Its entire public patent record is a single family, filed on 15 June 2023 by two named inventors, nothing granted. What does a record that thin actually tell you, and what does it refuse to tell you?

The raise$308MSeries D, Valor Equity Partners and Alumni Ventures
Patent families10 granted, 1 published and pending
Granted share0%First grants around 2026
Stage one

Three hundred and eight million, one pulse

The Series D was announced on 16 September 2026: $308M, with Valor Equity Partners, Alumni Ventures, Founders Fund, Gaingels and Lux Capital Management, LLC on the cap table. Impulse Space was founded in 2021. That is five years from incorporation to a raise of this size, which is the part of the story that is easy to read from the outside.

The harder part is what the raise sits on top of. A round is a single moment. A patent record is a sequence, and sequences can be checked against calendars. Impulse Space made its most recent public filing on 15 June 2023. That is thirty-nine months before the money landed. Everything filed since, if anything was filed, is still inside the publication delay.

A round is a moment. A filing has a date you can check.

Stage two

Nothing granted, everything still pending

One family exists in the public record. It is published and pending. Nothing has issued. The granted side of this picture is not narrow, it is empty, and the pending side carries the whole weight at a width of one.

The title is specific: improved timing and trilateration system for space applications and associated methods. Read it as written. It is a filing about timing and trilateration, and about the methods that go with it, and no more than that. The company's hiring skews to hardware, with software and AI next, which is consistent with a record pointed at this kind of subject matter rather than away from it.

Stage three

Two names, and one on everything

Two inventors are named across the entire public record. Barry Matsumori appears on one of one. Carl Haken appears on one of one. There is no third dot, no cluster of a dozen contributors on a single family, no long tail of one-off names that usually accumulates once a research organisation starts filing at volume.

That is what a first filing looks like when it comes out of a small group rather than a department. It tells you who was in the room in early 2023. It does not tell you who is in the room now. The company is recruiting in Redondo Beach across thermal, dynamics, identity governance and sourcing, which is a staffing pattern that does not yet appear anywhere on the inventor list.

Stage four

One circle, and the ones beside it

The classification this family falls into, G01C, has been busy. Over the last five years Toyota filed in the same groups on 781 families. Beihang University, 245. Beijing Baidu Netcom Sci &, 240. Beijing Institute, 237. Here Global, 227. Tencent Shenzhen, 204. Say nothing more about those organisations than that: they file here, in numbers.

Impulse Space is the small circle on the same axis, at one. In a classification this populated, count stops being the interesting variable. What matters is how narrowly or broadly the claims are drawn, and that will only be knowable when the pending family resolves. First grants for a June 2023 priority would be expected to land around 2026.

In a crowded class, scope is the only number that matters.

Stage five

Four arrows that do not connect

The raise does not imply the filings. $308M in September 2026 says nothing about what was drafted in June 2023. The filings do not imply the raise either. One pending family is not what a Series D is priced against, and nobody should read it that way.

Silence since June 2023 does not mean nothing was filed. Publication lags, so the recent record is invisible by construction. And a pending application is not an enforceable right. Zero of one is granted. Until that changes, the honest description of this position is early and unproven, not strong and not weak.

Stage six

What the next publications will settle

Here is the whole shape of it. A company founded in 2021 filed once, in June 2023, with two inventors, into a classification where several organisations file hundreds of families a year. Then it raised $308M, thirty-nine months later, with nothing yet granted. The public record and the funding record are not describing the same period of the company's life.

So the piece resolves to a matter of timing rather than judgement. The interesting facts about Impulse Space's filing behaviour after mid-2023 exist already. They are simply not public. The first of them should become visible as the pending family moves, and the answer will be in the claim language rather than in any count.

A diagram building through 6 stages: the funding event, drawn as a single pulse with the amount; the record splitting into a narrow granted ribbon and a wide pending one, so the skew is visible; the inventors as dots, with the most frequently named highlighted; the big filers in the same CPC groups as large circles, with this company as a small one on the same scale; inferences that do not hold, each drawn as an arrow with a cross through it; the closing question, set large in italic, with the earlier stages dimmed behind it. $308M Series D, 2026-09-16 Valor Equity Partners and Alumni Ventures Impulse Space, founded 2021, United States 1 patent family 0 granted 1 pending 0% of the record is issued 2 inventors named across the portfolio Barry Matsumori is named on 1 of 1 Carl Haken is named on 1 of 1 Inventor names do not establish ownership Filers in the same CPC groups, last five years Toyota 781 Beihang Univers… 245 Beijing Baidu N… 240 Beijing Institu… 237 Impulse Space 1 Shared classification indicates a common field, not a direct competitor What the record does not establish Inventor concentration Ownership A matching classification A direct competitor Each organizes an investigation. None settles it. Does one filing from 2023 still describe a company that raised $308M in 2026?

Is a one-family record early or empty?

Three things you might know about Impulse Space. Each one is suggestive and none is decisive on its own. Read them together, because a single pending family can support several different readings of the same company.

Where this sits

A single unresolved application

One published, pending family from 2023 and nothing else. Early, and honestly described as unproven.

What the next publications will settle

When the June 2023 family resolves, how narrowly are the timing and trilateration claims drawn?

Do publications appearing after this round show filings made between mid-2023 and the Series D, or a genuine pause?

Does the inventor list widen beyond Barry Matsumori and Carl Haken, or stay at two?

Does the record stay inside G01C, or does the classification spread as the Redondo Beach hardware hiring converts into filings?

Following those four would tell you whether the single 2023 family was the start of a deliberate programme or the only thing there was time to write down.

Common questions

How many patents does Impulse Space have?

Impulse Space holds 1 patent family as reviewed in 2026-09: 0 granted and 1 published and pending.

How many of Impulse Space's patents are granted?

None of the 1 family has granted yet. On typical pendency the first grants would be expected around 2026.

What technology do Impulse Space's patents cover?

Impulse Space's claims cluster in navigation and gyroscopes (G01C). Recent filing titles include "improved timing and trilateration system for space applications and associated methods".

Which companies file patents in the same areas as Impulse Space?

The same CPC groups drew Toyota, Beihang University, Beijing Baidu Netcom Sci & and Beijing Institute over the last five years. Shared classification indicates a common technology field rather than direct competition.

Who invented Impulse Space's patents?

2 inventors are named across the portfolio. The most frequently named is Barry Matsumori. Inventor names do not establish ownership, which is determined by assignment records.

How much has Impulse Space raised?

Impulse Space raised $308M in a Series D announced 2026-09-16, with Valor Equity Partners, Alumni Ventures, Founders Fund and Gaingels among its investors.

Scintillation Research does essentiality, landscape and infringement research for patent holders. Figures reviewed 2026-09-22.

GET IN TOUCH NOW!

    OR SCHEDULE A MEETING

    Shopping Cart (0 items)

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Sign up to receive latest news, updates, promotions, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
    No, thanks