Invalidity Search

Invalidity Search

An invalidity search looks for prior art the examiner missed: documents published before the patent’s priority date that disclose, alone or in combination, what the granted claims cover. Law firms defending an infringement claim, in-house counsel preparing an inter partes review and brokers pricing a portfolio use it to challenge or value granted claims.

Who it is for: Law firms defending an infringement claim, in-house counsel facing an assertion or preparing an inter partes review, and brokers pricing a portfolio before acquisition.

Revoking a patent is a challenging task. You must identify prior art documents the examiner missed during the prosecution phase.

We deliver detailed reports that include prior art, whether individual or combined, which can contest the granted claims.

Our initial step involves analysing the prosecution history to identify the reasons for the patent's approval.
We seek references that, either alone or in combination, invalidate the patent's claims.
To compile a thorough research report, our research spans various databases, including patents, non-patents, college projects, journals, books, meeting minutes, conference materials, and videos.

What you receive

  • A report mapping each reference, alone or in combination, to the claim elements it reads on
  • Copies of every source with the relevant passages marked
  • The prosecution history review that shaped the search
  • A call to walk through the findings and next steps

Frequently asked questions

An invalidity search looks for prior art the examiner missed: documents published before the patent’s priority date that disclose, alone or in combination, what the granted claims cover. The result is used to challenge the claims in litigation, at the patent office, or in a licensing negotiation.

Non-patent literature is where most of the strong references are. We search journals, conference papers, theses and student projects, books, meeting minutes, standards contributions, product manuals and videos, as well as worldwide patent databases.

The file wrapper shows why the examiner allowed the claims and which arguments the applicant relied on. Knowing that focuses the search on the features that actually carried the patent to grant.

Yes. We review existing references and charts against the claims and report where the mapping holds, where it is weak, and what is still missing.

For a quick demo, schedule a meeting now!

Contact Us

  • #31, 10th Floor, TDI Business Center, Mohali, 160055, India
  • +91 172 292 2272
  • info@sraas.com
Shopping Cart (0 items)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive latest news, updates, promotions, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
No, thanks
Select your currency